Why base salary is the worst way to compare offers
Recruiters quote base salary because it is the simplest number. Candidates remember base salary because it is the easiest to brag about. But base salary is, at best, 65–80% of your actual annual compensation — and the missing pieces are not evenly distributed.
A typical white-collar offer in 2026 includes base, a target bonus of 10–20%, a 4–6% 401k match, employer-paid health insurance (with employee contributions of $50–500/month), and some flavor of equity or RSU grant. Add it up and the gap between offers on a total-comp basis can be 25%+ even when the bases look identical.
The discipline this calculator enforces is simple: write down every dollar that hits your account (or compounds in a tax-advantaged account), subtract every dollar you pay for benefits, and compare those numbers. The headline base salary stops mattering once you do the math.
PTO is salary — here is the math
Most people treat PTO as a "perk." It is not. PTO is paid days off. Every day of PTO you take is a day you are paid at your daily rate without working. That is the textbook definition of salary, just delivered as time rather than cash.
Quantifying it: at $130,000/year, your daily rate is roughly $500 (assuming 260 working days). Ten extra PTO days is $5,000/year. Over a 30-year career at 4% real wage growth, the cumulative value of those extra ten days exceeds $250,000. That is a downpayment on a house — denominated in unrushed Tuesday mornings.
This is why the value score in the calculator adds PTO-as-dollars back to total comp. A $128,000 offer with 25 PTO days frequently beats a $135,000 offer with 12 PTO days on a value-adjusted basis. The cash-rich offer looks better in the offer letter; the PTO-rich offer is usually better for your life.
The benefits haircut nobody talks about
Two offers with identical $130,000 bases and identical bonuses can leave you with $7,000 of annual take-home difference based on benefits alone. Health insurance is the biggest lever — a "good" plan might cost you $80/month employee-only; a mediocre plan can run $450/month. That is $4,440 per year, every year, on a single line item.
Commute is the second silent killer. If one role is fully remote and the other requires three days in an office that takes a $14 daily round trip, that is roughly $2,200 per year — before parking, before the time cost. A "small" commute is a recurring 5-figure expense over a decade.
The calculator handles both directly: enter your share of the monthly health premium and your real monthly commute, and they get subtracted from total comp before the comparison. The "net after benefits" number is the one that actually lands in your bank account.
Effective hourly: the metric that ends the debate
When two offers are close on net comp but different on PTO, the cleanest way to break the tie is effective hourly rate. Compute it: net comp divided by actual working hours, where working hours = 2,080 minus PTO hours.
Example: Offer A pays $135,000 net comp with 12 PTO days. Working hours = 2,080 - 96 = 1,984. Effective hourly = $68.04. Offer B pays $128,000 net comp with 25 PTO days. Working hours = 2,080 - 200 = 1,880. Effective hourly = $68.09. Offer B has a higher hourly rate despite the $7,000 lower headline.
Effective hourly is also the right metric for comparing salaried roles to contracting or freelance work. A $150/hour contract is roughly equivalent to a $250,000 salaried role with average PTO — and most candidates underestimate this gap by half.
When to ignore the spreadsheet
If both offers land within 5% on net comp, stop optimizing the spreadsheet. The decision is now about growth potential, manager quality, team culture, commute or remote setup, and the kind of work you would do day-to-day. None of these show up in the calculator, but all of them dominate the comp gap over a 3–5 year horizon.
A typical raise trajectory at a fast-growth company can be 8–15% per year for the first few years; at a stable mid-cap it is 3–5%. Compound that for four years and the "smaller" offer at the higher-growth company is often the better long-term move — even if year-one comp is lower.
The right way to use this calculator: get to a tight number first so you stop guessing about money, then make the call based on the things money cannot capture. The comp comparison is the floor of the decision, not the ceiling.